Montag, 23. Mai 2022

Missing Miss Molly...Einen Monat nach ihrem Tod...A tribute with delay

 

Miss Molly.... 

Heute vor einem Monat mussten wir Molly gehen lassen. Fast 13 Jahre war sie unsere Begleiterin, entzückend und lieblich vom ersten Tag an, den sie bei uns war.-

A month ago today we had to let go of Molly. She was our companion for almost 13 years, delightful and lovely from the first day she was with us.

24.04.2011 
 
30 Tage ohne sie sind 30 Tage ohne ihre kühle Schnauze, mit der sie uns immer anstupste um uns mitzuteilen, dass sie dran war mit Fressen, mit Rausgehen, mit Gestreichelt werden, mit Spielen. Es sind 30 Tage ohne ihre wissenden Augen, mit denen sie uns anblickte, wenn wir es gerade brauchten, um uns von kleinen und großen Ärgernissen nicht überrollen zu lassen. 30 Tage ohne ihre unbändige Freude, wenn wir wieder nach Hause kamen. Es sind 30 Tage, ohne ihre charmante und vorwitzige Art, uns dazu zu bringen ihr im Haus hinterherzurennen um sie zu fangen, was immer damit endete, dass sie aufs Bett sprang um sich in einem Affentempo um sich selbst zu drehen bis hopps, sie wieder runtersprang um das Fang-mich-doch Spiel weiterzuspielen. - 

30 days without her is 30 days without her cool snout, with which she always nudged us to let us know that it was her turn to eat, to go out, to be petted, to play. It's been 30 days without her knowing eyes, with which she looked at us when we needed it to avoid being overwhelmed by small and larger annoyances. 30 days without her unbridled joy when we got home. It's 30 days without her charming and cheeky way of getting us to run around the house to catch her, which always ended with her jumping onto the bed spinning around at breakneck speed until, hopps, she again jumped down to continue playing the catch-me-if-you-can game. 

 


  

 First day with us...- 30.09.2009

 

 

Am 6. November 2009, Molly auf ihrem Weg zum Strand... -  

"... busy getting to the beach...!"

 
 
Tunnel Project 22.02.2010 


Die letzten Monate ihres Lebens schaffte sie es nicht mehr aufs Bett. Ihr Tumor war so groß geworden, dass sie das Springen von sich aus einstellte. Wir wussten, dass damit auch eine Wende eingetreten war. Dass wir uns innerlich vorbereiten mussten, sie vielleicht nicht mehr lange um uns zu haben. Wir fühlten es, sprachen lange aber nicht darüber. Bis dann der Tumor sich auch ausbreitete, erste Stellen begannen sich zu öffnen. Sie tropfte und war immer beschäftigt, sich sauber zu halten, sie ließ uns nicht an ihre Wunden. Ansonsten blieb sie so, wie sie immer war, an unserer Seite, mit Appetit bis zum Schluss. Sie schien schmerzfrei zu sein, das schob die Entscheidung hinaus. Sie lief immer noch hinter den Katzen her, bellte, wenn die anderen Hunde bellten, zog sich aber tagsüber fast unmerklich mehr zurück um zu ruhen. Und sie trank große Mengen Wasser, oft ein Zeichen von Krankheit oder Schmerz. Ostern war dann die rote Linie erreicht. Die offenen Stellen begannen zu müffeln, das Tropfen wurde mehr. Wir wollten nicht, dass es zu dem Punkt kommt, wo Infektionen ihr das Leben schwer machten, Schmerzen unausweichlich waren und Aktivitäten fast nicht mehr möglich.

In the last months of her life she couldn't get on to the bed. Her tumor had grown so large that she stopped jumping on her own. We knew that this was also a turning point, that we had to prepare ourselves internally, that maybe we wouldn't have her around for much longer. We felt it, but didn't talk about it for some time. Until when the tumor spread, and the first spots began to open. She was dripping and always busy keeping herself clean, she wouldn't let us touch and treat her wounds. Otherwise she stayed the way she always was, at our side, with quite an appetite until the end. She appeared to be pain free, which put off the decision. She still ran after the cats, barked when the other dogs barked, but subtly withdrew more during the day to rest. At Easter the red line was reached. The open spots began to smell, the dripping increased. We didn't want it to get to the point where infections would make life even more difficult for her, when pain would be inevitable and activity almost impossible.
 
 
06.09.2015 
 
 
 Maitage....May Days/01.05.2014
 
Die wenigen verbleibenden Tage bis zu dem Samstag, an dem die Tierärztin mit der Injektion kam, waren bitter-süß und zerrten an uns. Ich fragte mich immer wieder, ob es nicht doch zu früh sei, da sie so konsequent an unserer Seite blieb, immer neugierig war, was es zu Fressen gab, so als wollte sie uns sagen, keine Sorge, ich bleibe bei euch. Ich glaube, sie kannte uns gut, und fühlte, dass wir ein Problem hatten. Als der Samstag kam, war ich ziemlich aufgeweicht, versuchte so gut es ging, letzte Momente von Normalität für Molly herzustellen. Dirk, der wusste, dass er den Augenblick der Injektion, den letzten Blick aus ihren Augen, nicht aushalten würde können, ging auf einen anderweitig zehrenden Inselmarsch. Mit der Tierärztin hatte ich über meine Einschätzung gesprochen, dass Molly sich wahrscheinlich wehren würde, wenn sie mit der Spritze kam, so wie es früher tat, wenn sie geimpft werden sollte, und dass ich nicht wollte, dass sie am Schluss noch kämpfen müsse. Sie riet mir dazu, Molly eine Stunde bevor sie kommen würde, ein Beruhigungsmittel zu geben. Das war hilfreich, auch wenn mir das Herz dabei fast brach, Molly dabei zuzusehen, selbst gegen die Wirkung des Beruhigungsmittels angehen zu wollen, sobald es seine Wirkung entfaltete. Sie lief noch in den Garten, ein letztes mal Pipi machen, dann zum Tor, als hielte sie Ausschau nach Dirk oder den Hühnern, die auch gerade da waren. Dann suchte sie sich einen Platz mit wärmenden Sonnenstrahlen. Selbst dort blieb sie nicht. Ihre Beine gaben zwar nach, aber sie schaffte es noch ein letztes Mal bis unter den Tisch um mich anzusehen, um dann, als die Tierärztin kam, sogar noch einmal mit Schwanzwedeln auf sie zuzugehen.-
 
The few days left until the Saturday when the vet came with the injection were bittersweet and tugging at us. I kept wondering if it wasn't too early after all, since she stayed so consistently by our side, always curious about what was to eat, as if to tell us don't worry, I'll stay with you. I think she knew us well and felt we had a problem. By the time Saturday came I was quite softened, trying as best I could to create last moments of normalility for Molly. Dirk, knowing he couldn't stand the moment of the injection, the last glimpse out of her eyes, went on an otherwise draining island trek. I had spoken to the vet about my assessment that Molly would probably fight back if she came with the shot, as she used to do if she was going to be vaccinated, and that I didn't want her to end up fighting. She advised me to give Molly a sedative an hour before she was due to come. That was helpful, although it broke my heart to watch Molly try to counteract the effects of the tranquilizer herself once it started to take effect. She ran into the garden, peeing one last time, then to the gate, as if she were looking out for Dirk or the chickens, who were also there at the time. Then she looked for a place with warming rays of sunshine. Even there she did not stay. Her legs gave out, but she made it under the table one last time to look at me, and then when the vet came up to her again, tail wagging. 
 
  
 
An older photo... when she was looking for Dirk or the chicken....
 
Es ging dann ganz schnell. Wir entschieden, sie nicht höher zu lagern, ich hielt sie einfach sanft fest, mehr war nicht mehr nötig. Die Spritze und dann war es das auch schon. Kein Kampf, kein Zittern. Das Präparat wirkte sofort. Ich hatte dies zuvor bereits einmal miterlebt bei einem Hund von Paul und war darauf vorbereitet. So wie sie nach ihrem allerletzten Atemzug aussah, möchte ich annehmen, dass sie Frieden finden wird. Sie war schöner denn je, und strahlte Friedlichkeit aus, während nun bei mir alle Dämme brachen.-
 
Then it happened very quickly. We decided not to store her higher, I just held her gently, nothing more was needed. The syringe and that was it. No struggle, no shaking. The preparation worked immediately. I had witnessed this before with one of Paul's dogs and was prepared for it. From the way she looked after her very last breath, I would like to assume that she would find peace. She was more beautiful than ever, and radiated peacefulness, while now all dams broke for me.
 
After her last breath...I was not sure if to show this picture, but the peacefulness had something comforting which in the end I wanted to share... 
 

Ich hatte dafür gesorgt, dass Molly schnell unter den Bananen begraben würde, auch um Dirk zu ersparen, Molly tot zu sehen, er hatte sie so in Erinnerung behalten wollen, wie sie im Leben war. Selbst stark angeschlagen mit seinem Herzen, und nicht mehr gewöhnt weite Strecken zu laufen oder tiefe Löcher zu graben, hatte er sich bei seinem Marsch übernommen. Mit einer Flasche Wasser holte ich ihn ab und wir liefen dann im Schneckentempo gemeinsam nach Hause, was irgendwie stimmig war. Bin ich 2008 nach Simbas plötzlichem Tod aus dem Weinen und Trauern fast ein ganzes Jahr nicht herausgekommen, so war es jetzt mit Molly eine andere Art des Trauerns. Ein wenig stiller, ein wenig einsamer, aber auch ein wenig erwachsener, da wir vorbereitet waren. 
 
I had made sure that Molly was quickly buried under the bananas, also to save Dirk from seeing Molly dead, he had wanted to remember her as she was in life. Despite his severely compromised heart condition, and no longer used to walking long distances or digging deep holes, he had exhausted himself on his march. I picked him up with a bottle of water and we walked home together at a snail's pace, which somehow made sense. In 2008, after Simba's sudden death, I couldn't get out of crying and mourning for almost a year, now it was a different kind of mourning with Molly. A little quieter, a little more lonely, but also a little more grown-up because we were prepared.
  
 
Dass sie uns fehlt, braucht keine sonderliche Erwähnung. Vermissen tun wir sie jeden Tag. Weniger die Katzen, die haben sich gleich nach Mollys Tod angewöhnt, ihr Terrain in Beschlag zu nehmen, manchmal gleich bis ins Haus, wo sie sich nachts einfach einen ruhigen, warmen Platz suchen. Wir mögen das und lassen sie gewähren. Alleine werden wir nicht bleiben. 
 
It goes without saying that we miss her. We miss her every day. Not so the cats, they got into the habit of taking over their territory immediately after Molly's death, sometimes right into the house, where they simply looked for a quiet, warm place at night. We like that and let them have their way. We won't stay alone.
 

 



Related:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Maitage....May Days/01.05.2014

Donnerstag, 17. März 2022

#PutinsWar in Ukraine...Fossil Fuel War With The Climate Losing

Another New York Times "Debatable" newsletter in my inbox...Again it's about #PutinsWar in the #Ukraine.Today it's about the effectiveness of sanctions in the light of an important sector not yet been shut. The complete stop of oil and gas imports from Russia remains for a majority of observers the only way to keep Putin at bay, - beside the No Flight Zone as Ukrainian's most urgent demand to keep the Russians out of their sky, which has been refused out of fear to enter WWIII and to risk the use of nuclear weapons.

But how is it possible to become independent from Russia's oil and gas in the first place? How long will it take? How many other dependencies will be created? And above all, which consequences will the transition of becoming less dependent have for our climate?

 

NYTimes.com/Opinion

March 16, 2022


  Illustration by The New York Times; Photography by Sean Gallup, Johanna Geron, Scott Olson, and Mikhail Klimentyev, via Getty Images


 

By Spencer Bokat-Lindell

Staff Editor, Opinion

At the end of February, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a body of experts convened by the United Nations, released a scientific report warning that the dangers of global warming are mounting so rapidly that adapting to them could soon become impossible. “Delay,” the U.N. secretary general said of the findings, “means death.”

The report came out just days after President Vladimir Putin of Russia began his assault on Ukraine, so the world’s attention was understandably trained elsewhere. But soon enough, commentators began pointing out the role that Russia’s fossil fuel trade has played in underwriting the invasion, thrusting climate change and its causes back into the spotlight.

“The world is paying Russia $700 million a day for oil and $400 million for natural gas,” Oleg Ustenko, an economic adviser to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told The New Yorker this month. “You are paying all this money to a murderous leader who is still killing people in my country.”

How is the war in Ukraine shaping the politics of fossil fuel dependency, and how might the conflict advance or hobble the global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Here’s what people are saying.

This is a fossil fuel war’

One of the largest producers of fossil fuels in the world, Russia is highly dependent on its energy trade, with fossil fuels accounting for almost half of its exports and 28 percent of its federal budget in 2020.

Unlike the United States, the European Union has not banned imports of Russian oil and gas, and it’s no secret why: Europe relies on Russia for about one-third of its oil and 40 percent of its natural gas. (The United States, by contrast, gets none of its natural gas and only about 3 percent of the oil it consumes from Russia.)

Germany is especially dependent on Russian fossil fuels; it is Europe’s largest energy consumer and Russia’s most important customer. That dependence deepened after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, in 2011, when Angela Merkel committed to closing all of Germany’s nuclear plants. (The powerful earthquake that struck the same region of Japan on Wednesday was significantly less violent than the one that caused the 2011 disaster and does not appear to have damaged the country’s nuclear plants, even as it left two million homes without power.) Russia now supplies more than half of Germany’s gas, half of its coal and about a third of its oil, according to Bloomberg.

Until recently, German leaders didn’t see this dependency as a problem. As Alec McGillis explains in The New Yorker, Germany actually chose to rely on Russia “because it saw the economic links created by fuel imports — physical links, in the form of pipelines through Eastern Europe and under the Baltic Sea — as integral to keeping peace and integrating Russia into the rest of Europe.”

The big picture: In the view of Svitlana Krakovska, Ukraine’s leading climate scientist, who helped finalize the I.P.C.C. report from Kyiv as Russia invaded, the war on her home country is inextricably linked to climate change. “Burning oil, gas and coal is causing warming and impacts we need to adapt to,” she told The Guardian. “And Russia sells these resources and uses the money to buy weapons. Other countries are dependent upon these fossil fuels; they don’t make themselves free of them. This is a fossil fuel war. It’s clear we cannot continue to live this way. It will destroy our civilization.”

How the war could spur climate action

In the immediate term, Germany and others could take measures to reduce their consumption of Russian fossil fuels, as the Times columnist Paul Krugman explains. Eliminating their use, though, would incur steep costs to the German people equivalent to those of a moderate recession.

“It’s not so simple to just say, ‘OK, overnight, now we’re going to suddenly switch and no longer going to be dependent on natural gas from Russia,’ or fossil fuels in general,” Pete Ogden, vice president for energy, climate and the environment at the U.N. Foundation, told Yahoo News. “Right now, you’re seeing that vulnerability exposed and there not being easy, short-term fixes to that problem.”

But it’s evident that the fusion of foreign-policy and climate interests has lent more political momentum to decarbonization. Germany, for its part, just earmarked 200 billion euros for investment in renewable energy production between now and 2026. “Many of the strategies to lower dependency on Russia are the same as the policy measures you want to take to lower emissions,” Thijs Van de Graaf, a professor of international politics at Ghent University, told The Financial Times. “At the moments where we have these crises, the [energy] transition can be supercharged.”

The European Union has vowed to slash Russian natural gas imports by two-thirds by next winter and to cut them out entirely by 2027. “That would be an extremely ambitious timetable in peacetime, but if the continent shifts to a war footing — as it must, with a savage conflict playing out on its eastern borders — then it should be achievable,” The Boston Globe editorial board writes.

Key to the transition, the board adds, is increasing American production of minerals and metals required for renewable energy technology. Russia is a key supplier of those materials, so the West needs to ensure it doesn’t become just as reliant on Russia for clean energy production as it is now for fossil fuels.

In The Times, Simone Tagliapietra, Georg Zachmann and Morgan Bazilian call for a pact between North America and Europe to help the continent reduce its short-term dependence on Russian fuel. “Such a pact could also build an important foundation for cooperation in clean energy innovation and deployment and reducing energy demand in the longer term — which would significantly enhance Europe’s energy security,” they write.

Four ways the war could derail climate action instead

Fossil fuels — not renewable energy — end up filling the void. As energy prices soar, some fossil fuel executives have seized on the crisis as a business opportunity. At CERAWeek, an annual energy conference that was held in Houston this month, climate change was supposed to feature heavily. Instead, Kate Aronoff reports for The New Republic, the focus shifted to increased domestic fossil fuel production.

“An industry that’s spent the last two years and billions of dollars trying to convince the world that it can ‘decarbonize hydrocarbons’ is much too savvy to brag about all the money to be made off a humanitarian catastrophe,” she writes. “Accordingly, the message fossil fuel execs pivoted to, as Russian troops crept further into Ukraine, is that they’re patriots, standing ready to meet the world’s energy needs and build American ‘energy independence.’”

Countries rethink their priorities. As politicians divert their attention to the invasion, investment in climate mitigation and adaptation could find themselves on the back burner, usurped by the perceived need for greater military spending. And militaries are highly energy-intensive: According to the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University, the Pentagon’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2017 exceeded those of entire industrialized countries, such as Sweden, Denmark and Portugal.

“If war wins, climate action loses,” Andrew Sheng writes for The Jakarta Post. “Increased defense expenditure will accelerate energy and nonrenewable material consumption” as well as push up emissions, “thus diverting scarce resources away from climate action.”

The United States continues to suffer from political gridlock. While the Biden administration has made ambitious promises to transition the country to net-zero emissions by 2050, his climate legislation has been held up for months by members of his own party, and the crisis in Ukraine has done nothing to move that particular needle.

Even Biden himself has been wary of connecting the war in Ukraine to climate change. In his State of the Union address, he made glancing mention of the issue, but “did not articulate the long-term opportunity for the U.S. to lead the world in breaking free of the geopolitical nightmare that is oil dependency,” said Paul Bledsoe, a strategic adviser to the Progressive Policy Institute, a Washington-based think tank.

One explanation for the reticence: During a midterm election year, the administration is worried about being blamed for rising gas prices. Even in deep-blue California, the issue is being treated as a political liability.

Military conflict crowds out cooperation. As my colleague Ezra Klein said on a recent episode of his podcast with the economic historian Adam Tooze, the goal of global decarbonization can be met only if countries work together. But “the hotter conflict gets, the harder cooperation gets,” he noted.

It bodes ill, then, that Russia, as one of the world’s largest producers of fossil fuels, is vital to the international effort to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, and has so far shown a “critically insufficient” commitment to that, according to Climate Action Tracker. If climate diplomacy was halting during peacetime, what chance is there for it now?

Tooze, however, was more optimistic than Klein about the prospects for decarbonization in an era of renewed great-power competition. International cooperation is important, but “if you take the climate problem as seriously as I think we have to at this point and as seriously as I think big parts of the leadership in China increasingly are, it’s a national interest issue,” he said. “You do it because you’ve got to do it.”


Related:

- Sanctions, Boycotts, Bans - Cancel culture as reaction to #PutinsWar?/ 09.03.2022

- War / 03.03.2022

- War on the horizon???/04.02.2022 

 

#PutinsWar